Sunday, January 29, 2012

The Accessible Oscars

The Oscars are strange. I’ve seen the movies, I enjoyed a good number of them, yet I’m never quite satisfied when the award show is over. There are of course the moments where Queen Amidala, Batman, the Joker, and a Tarantino Nazi win the trophies, but that just isn’t enough. (Natalie Portman and Christian Bale did not win for their performances in Star Wars and Batman, but for their work in Black Swan and The Fighter respectively.)

What if there was an Oscars that wasn’t contingent on the opinions of Hollywood insiders living within their politically pretentious bubble in Sunny California? The People’s Choice awards don’t fill that void for me. I don’t know the specifics of who would vote for these non-Oscars, but if it were me, here’s how the nominations would play out. For now, let’s say those films nominated in the real show are disqualified from this one.

The main goal for each nominee is the accessibility to the common moviegoer. Would you be more invested in an Oscars ceremony with the following nominees?

Best Actor:

Joel Edgerton- Warrior

Joseph Gordon Levitt- 50/50

Hugh Jackman- Real Steel

Daniel Radcliffe- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. II


Best Supporting Actor:

Kyle Chandler- Super 8

Ryan Gosling- Crazy, Stupid, Love

Alan Rickman- Harry potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. II

Andy Serkis- Rise of the Planet of the Apes


Best Actress:

Kirsten Dunst- Melancholia

Saorise Ronan- Hanna

Jodie Whittaker- Attack the Block

Kristin Wiig- Bridesmaids


Best Supporting Actress:

Amber Heard- The Rum Diary

Anna Kendrick- 50/50

Jennifer Morrison- Warrior

Emma Stone- Crazy, Stupid, Love


Best Picture:

50/50


Bridesmaids


Crazy, Stupid, Love


Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. II


Mission: Impossible- Ghost Protocol


Rise of the Planet of the Apes


Super 8


Warrior

Monday, January 9, 2012

Top 10 Films of 2011


While 2011 box office numbers were down and people griped about sequels dominating the theaters, the truth is that there were tons of great films out there. I definitely saw some that stunk, but the seasons that promised quality definitely delivered. The summer had massive blockbusters, the late fall brought on the award show buzz and many new faces came along who are happy we paid that 3D surcharge. 

My top ten film list is based on 105 different films, which I saw in theaters during 113 trips. Let’s just say I saw a few movies more than once.

(Click titles to read full reviews)


In order to give Crazy, Stupid, Love justice I would have to spoil some cringe-worthy and surprising plot elements. I won’t do that, but let’s just say that the audience doesn’t see the best scenes in the movie coming at all. Unpredictability and romantic comedies don’t usually go together, so it’s quite a testament to the script and directors for not giving away their secrets too early. 


One of the many successful aspects of Rise is the willingness to get away from the expected and iconic imagery of the past films. There is no Statue of Liberty scene and no instances of a human man kissing an ape woman. Only the inclusion of the famed “you damn dirty ape” line made the cut. From there the movie is much less an action blockbuster than intellectual thriller. 


The reach of this film is massive. After five years since Mission: Impossible 3, this fourth installment goes for it, pushing the limits of a film that looks like it cost significantly more than its $145 million budget. 


Based on the Philip K. Dick short story, Bureau is one of those rare movies that give over-saturated moviegoers a well-executed, unique story. I would put it just a step behind Inception in the realm of sci-fi creativity. 


The two women are the real stars here, providing a powerfully real look at how emotions would take hold in this apocalyptic situation. Melancholia is heart-breakingly sad, but somehow the viewer can walk away with fulfillment because it is such an intense study of human emotion. 


Tinker has the strong sense of classic espionage thrillers. There is no need for fast-paced chase scenes because the tension is already there. All the characters have a seedy sense to them that gives credit to how authentic the film comes across. 


Taking out all of the specifics regarding sound and color, The Artist is an interesting story full of strong storytelling and quality characters. The film would likely appeal to moviegoers from any point in the last 80 years. 


Even with sad moments and high drama, the film is a pleasing cinematic experience. The pacing is reminiscent of mid-century romances, and even though the boy doesn’t get the girl in the end, it isn’t that important. Colin was never going to win over Marilyn Monroe. The movie is too real for that type of fairytale ending. 


A long film, War Horse is a story that needs that time to build up the audience’s emotion. There are so many casualties in the film that this horse becomes as much of a morale boost to the viewer as he is for the characters he interacts with. 


Harry Potter has proven to be one of the most important stories in cinematic history because of its consistent quality and influence on a multi-billion dollar industry. For this reason, plus my own personal admiration, I can’t put a score on Deathly Hallows Part II. But if I wanted to completely show my bias, I could just say that numbers just don’t go high enough. 

 Honorable Mentions: The remaining films that received a score higher than 9.0 


 (Please leave your top ten list in the comments and let us know why you liked what you did.)

The New Grading System

Following up my 100+ trips to the movie theater in 2011, I have decided to update my grading system for What’s Up Movement. The previous method saw 101 possible scores between 0.0 and 10.0, though most of those possibilities never came up. Because of that, I received much scrutiny about always giving movies sevens or eights. But by my standards, most of them fell in that range. Rarely did a movie only get 10 percent correct. Skeptical moviegoers may disagree and that’s okay.

So in 2012, I will be converting over to the more commonly used five star system. But here we're going to use arrows. With that comes a less specific score, but the goal will be to make it less arbitrary as well. Each film will have the ability to earn one arrow in five categories. This may mean movie score averages will be commonly higher or lower than before. I can’t be sure yet. The five categories are listed below.

*Acting- Plain and Simple, did the actors help or hurt the overall movie

*Writing/Directing- From dialogue to after effects, how successful were those behind the camera.

*Emotion- Was the intended reaction achieved?

*Innovation- Will the film have any impact on their genre or audiences?

*Overall Impression- Positive or negative

So from there it must be said that I will still rate the films I see with the optimistic approach I always have. Those who disagree are welcome to comment on the individual post or our Facebook page. Though I have to warn you, the people who say “No way, that sucked” just come off as trashy and uneducated. The words in the review have always been more important than the score. So keep that in mind.

I’d love to read your reviews and commentary too. I may be the primary writer, but that doesn’t mean people wouldn’t want a second opinion. Thanks for visiting What’s Up Movement.

-Tom

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Five Things We Learned From the Golden Globe Nominations

5- The Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) isn’t particularly fond of network television.

This isn’t anything new, but the fact that no dramas were nominated from the major networks is a bit annoying. Since there is such a variation between regulations on cable and network TV, there should be separate categories. Luckily for us supporters of the channels numbered with single digits, the HFPA all eat up Modern Family. The comedy categories are a better cross-section of what’s out there.

4- Critics/award show voters are blowhards.

I saw Bridesmaids, it was funny. It is by no means even close to being a best picture nominee. The fact that critics jumped on it and the performances of Kristin Wiig and Melissa McCarthy were noticed seems to overshadow the fact that people are physically pooped and vomited on in the movie. If you’re going to be pretentious about movies, be pretentious. Let’s not pretend you are looking for a good escapist comedy.

3- Alien languages don’t count as foreign.

There were some good alien languages showcased this year. Cowboys and Aliens, Battle: Los Angeles, and whatever accent Adam Sandler has in Jack and Jill. Somehow all of them were left out of the best foreign language film category. Instead the nominees are four films I never heard of and the one directed by Angelina Jolie. Bummer.

2- George Clooney is nominated in every single category.

How he got nominated for best animated motion picture I’ll never know, but Clooney must have been busy this year. Actually it’s only best screenplay, director, and actor in a drama. Then there are the categories his two films, Ides of March and The Descendants are in. I can’t wait to hear how he’ll bring up being the only Batman whose suit had nipples this year. Never gets old. (Always gets old)

1 – The HFPA don’t really know what they’re talking about.

As the black sheep of the award season, the Golden Globes usually miss the memo on who is supposed to win. I hardly ever agree with who win Oscars, but at least they’re consistently off base with the viewing public. Sometimes the Golden Globes pick movies like Avatar as best picture. So what does that mean? It means this is the only award show that will actually contain surprises.

Note: I just remembered Ricky Gervais is hosting. So it will contain surprises and reminders of why Ricky Gervais isn’t funny.